Image: Smart&Digitalcities Creative
Our editorial team has long explored the intersection of media, technology, and public security. Today, we take a deeper look into the increasingly urgent issue of children and social media—an area fraught with risks that, in some cases, have led to tragic consequences including abuse and even death.
Australia is currently making global headlines with a groundbreaking legislative move: children and teenagers under the age of 16 will no longer be allowed access to social media platforms such as X, Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok.
This new law, supported by substantial penalties for non-compliance, is intended—according to the Australian Prime Minister—to safeguard the mental health of young people.
A Controversial Law with Far-Reaching Implications
While the aim to protect children from the dangers of social media is clear, the legislation has sparked intense debate. Critics—including academics, civil society groups, and even Elon Musk—argue that the law is both technically difficult to enforce and socially problematic.
The Risk of the Dark Web
Experts caution that cutting off teenagers from their primary channels of communication may lead to social isolation—or worse, drive them toward more dangerous digital spaces such as the Dark Web. Furthermore, the enforcement of age verification raises practical and ethical concerns.
What About Data Protection?
Although the Australian government plans to develop new age-verification technologies, data protection advocates warn of serious privacy risks. It remains unclear how platforms are expected to implement such requirements without compelling users to reveal sensitive personal information.
A Model or a Warning for Europe?
Australia’s bold move could influence policymakers in Europe, where debates over stricter regulations for social media platforms are already well underway. Platforms like TikTok are frequently criticised for spreading harmful content that poses threats to children’s well-being. At the same time, existing age restrictions—such as the 14+ minimum age for YouTube and Google—are easily bypassed. Many children simply create fake accounts or use their parents‘ login details.
A Divided Debate on How to Protect Children
While the Australian government appears to enjoy strong public backing—surveys suggest around 77% of Australians support the ban—many questions remain unresolved:
- How much responsibility should rest with parents?
- How far should governments go in regulating access to social media?
- Can technology be effectively used for protection, even if it risks undermining privacy?
- Does Europe need similar measures to better protect its youth?
- Or do such bans go too far, potentially pushing young people into isolation or more hazardous online environments?
- And finally, can technical tools like facial recognition or age verification really solve the problem—or are we underestimating how skilled today’s youth are at outsmarting such systems?
This debate is not just about platforms or policies. It’s about the future of a generation—and how far society is willing to go to protect it.
